News Article on 'Enjoy France' Enjoy reading Attribution is the cornerstone of any encyclopedia and, sorry, but saying you're an actor and you know Radcliffe is original research , which also is against policy. Of the three sources you've cited above, one does not note its source while a second uses an author without explaining who he is or where he got his information. The other, from Sun Herald, notes the source as the Associated Press and passes verifiability standards.
RadioKirk u t c Certainly, Wikipedia is not censored , but this policy primarily refers to articles in which there's a reasonable expectation that an image represents its subject, such as an image or diagram on vagina or penis. This particular image here suggests unnecessary exposition and, I believe, would unnecessarily and this is key shock younger Potter fans.
A young actor appears naked on stage-this shocks the media blah blah blah. We have a shocking image of the actor naked on stage, so this isn't unnecessary exposition. Regarding young fans-isn't there a template that says "this article may contain images that are not suitable for younger readers" or something along those lines? If not, i'll be happy to make one. This may be a case of us to keep goimg forward and if there's a storm we deal with it then and there.
No such image existed prior to the premiere, or it would have been all over the place. This image, even if legit and, right now, that's a big "if" , would not correctly illustrate the text, IMO. B-most people don't want the standards of their webpage degraded. My original intention was to say that only http: I came upon this discussion with that legitimate image in place, so I presumed incorrectly you were looking for a url for that one. I agree that Dan2. That's why I reverted when Dalejenkins put up Dan2.
I believe RadioKirk and I are in violent agreement. In a few minutes, I will be presenting undeniable proof that this image is a fake. Those of us who have seen the West End production can attest to the mohel's visit, and why Dan2. As I like to joke, I'm not Jewish, but my doctor apparently was I try to do these things by the book so I'm not abusing my administrator's privileges; a recognized theatre reviewer noting in print "the mohel's visit", as you put it, would be acceptable proof, but and, with every respect a Wiki editor saying he's seen the production is original research.
To deny and delete an image requires that I offer up the incontrovertible, and that meant a direct comparison of the images. Must apologise for my sense of humour. Not entirely unproductive an exchange, though - between my "mohel's visit" and your "original research", we've done the cause of obfuscation proud.
I grant that not a small percentage of the audience at the Gielgud Theatre is probably there for original research on The funny part is, I know how Mel Brooks pronounces mohel basically, moil , but I'd never gotten 'round to looking up the spelling—initially, I thought you'd misspelled "model", leading me to ask myself, "how am I supposed to find the model used to fake the image among tens if not hundreds of thousands of similar images on the Internet?
It isn't just his dick that's wrong, it's the entire lower half of his body. He's the one on theDVD cover not the adult DC , and each actor has one epsiode, so it's not as if he's only playing the younger version in flashback scenes or something.
David Copperfield is TV so we don't see as much a broad view of his career. It's in the article that Radcliffe's father is from Northern Ireland. Admittedly that doesn't make him Irish, but Radcliffe has referred to himself in an interview as being half-Irish.
Is there a verifiable reference for the interview? My memory is good I remember his comment that he's half-Irish and the context in which he made it: I believe he was saying he's good at telling stories However, I know I'm never going to search through the many video clips available online to find the one where he says this. If Radcliffe senior is actually a Protestant from Northern Ireland, it's highly unlikely that he identifies as Irish, so the "half-Irish" thing was probably just an offhand joke.
It certainly isn't grounds for stating that Radcliffe is of Irish descent. If this is true, can someone post infomation about it in the article? More details can be found on the IMDb. Does Marcia Gresham deserve her own article?
Providing there's enough information out there, then there's no reason why she can't have her own article. Anyone with an IMDb page deserves a Wikipedia article. For example, one may argue that this actress does not and hundreds of thousands like her Mad Jack Yes, maybe not everyone But Marcia Gresham I think.
There are links to all of these already within the text itself. And this time it should stay, because the subjects of the link are not easily accessible in the article, and most actually aren't there at all. Articles outside wikipedia say things like 'full-frontal sex'. So which is it? Does he appear nude? Or is he actually having sex onstage? I mean, what exactly is he doing? During one scene, he's fully nude, and simulates sexual intercourse with his female co-star, who is also completely nude.
He doesn't actually have sex on stage during the performance, as that would be illegal in the UK. You have to go to Amsterdam if you want to see that sort of thing. Dan was also involved in other charity works aside from DEmelza but I don';t have a link to them. One can make donations specifically on behalf of Dan from either of his official websites: Dan has specifically requested that his fans make donations to Demelza House in lieu of sending him gifts for his birthday or Christmas. Doesn't anyone else think that Daniel Radcliffe's role in David Copperfield is noteable infobox , because it was one of the main parts, and people are familiar with that.
I think it should go in the infobox. Well, seen as no one-else has shared their views and no-ne has objected, I think I'll add it on. Any complaints now after all this time from regular editors to this article will be frowned upon.
Worth putting in I think. So, here's the link for reference reasons: Sky News - Radcliffe's new car With regards, Lra drama Dan's publicist has now confirmed that this rumour is completely false and was apparently someone's idea of a publicity stunt in the press. Rumour quashing posted on  -- Eowynan There are lots of people who revert this vandalism, which is good to see. But only the RC Patrol regulars and MartinBot of course actually warn the vandals and tell them to stop vandalising Wikipedia.
Can the rest of you please consider it too? It's only right, and it lets vandals know what is accepted and what isn't. Thank you, Lra drama Note that's not what the article said.
What it said is that he smoked in Equus and December Boys. It is just one of the things that has to be done in that profession similar with kissing, sex scenes, stunts - although stunt men are often employed! He further commented that they're quite nasty tasting, but must be inhaled, as otherwise too much smoke is expelled which doesn't look convincing on stage or screen.
According to the edit summaries there are large chunks of text regularly coming and going. Please resubmit the article again for GA review when the article is stable. I wondered if someone has noticed or if it is just my ignorance that the "Early Life" section sounds more like a prank than real facts? Especially information about he and Emma Watson, the neighbour catching him naked, etc.
I am no daniel radcliffe pro, but the "Early life" section doesn't sound much like encyclopedic information. Sorry you had to read it when it was in that state. He has repeatedly denied communicating with fans over the internet. Can we stop putting these claims on the article please, because all they do is get reverted. There are so many false rumours and information that the tabloids put out about Dan that no one should be posting anything in this article without confirmation.
Unless something is confirmed by the official U. Hopefully they'll go away and forget about it when they are unable to get the instant satisfaction. Look at the article history before it's just expired - bliss! The listing of his awards and nominations seem to portray only one side of his perceived talents as an actor. As most harry potter fans will attest Daniel Radcliffe has been a very poor actor.
Critical reviews attest to his shortcomings. For instance the New York Times in its recent Harry Potter feature quietly criticized his acting abilities or lack there of. Radcliffe it was rather obvious what their feelings were of the young actor. These feelings have long been discussed among fans and critics alike and it seems only fair some mention of these beliefs are shared within the wiki community.
What did Daniel Radcliffe study for his G.